Friday, March 22, 2019
Julius Caesar :: essays research papers
The story of Julius Caesars character assassination has been told twain historically and fictionally. Historical sources focus on the facts of the assassination, while fictionary plant focus more on the characters and the drama of the story. Because of the different purposes of the sources, there be many differences between the historical and fictional stories. William Shakespe bes Julius Caesar adds certain lucubrate and dramatic elements to make the story more interesting and to make the defend more enjoyable. Historical sources such as Roger Brunss Caesar and Manuel Komroffs Julius Caesar take an more accurate account of the events that occurred on and around the Ides of March. There are however, because all of the sources are telling the same story, even more similarities. recitation all of the sources can give a reader an understanding of not only what really happened and why, but alike what the people involved were plausibly like.The time before Caesars death has many differences in how events happened alternatively than if events happened. Both historical accounts record that Caesar had recently returned from a long army campaign that sent him to the far reaches of the Roman Empire. Shakespeares account tells of a recent victory over Pompey but does not say that Caesar returned from a massive campaign. In Komroffs account, The conspirators had planned for much longer than the another(prenominal) authors recorded. Komroff wrote that the conspirators convinced the Senate to offer Caesar the crown. The conspirators then placed a crown on a statue of Caesar that was quickly torn down by Caesars friends. Then, a few days later, as he was riding through the streets of Rome, a caboodle of people who had been led on by the Aristocrats hailed him as faggot (Komroff 161-162). The final offer of the crown occurred before a large crowd of Romans, when a crown was placed on Caesars head he took it off and said The Romans have no kings but their gods (K omroff 162). Caesar refused the title every(prenominal) time because he knew that the second he did, the people would turn against him. Caesar also knew that the conspirators were behind these offers and was not about to play right into their hands. In both Shakespeares and Brunss works, Mark Antony was the one who offered the crown to Caesar. He did not do it to harm Caesar but out of respect for Caesar.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment