”Bon Voyage, Mr President” by Gabriel Garcia Marquez Essay

Bon Voyage, Mr professorship is a short account write by Gabriel Garcia Marquez. This is a tale of a South American hot seat in exile. Nearing the end of his days, we are given an insight into the life of a creation with injured pride, reminiscing the days that went by and so fast, where the President had lost everything he had worked for and knew.QuotesBon Voyage, Mr. PresidentResting on the silver handle of his c every downThis quotation emphasises the Presidents cultivation and importance. His importance is enforced by the fact he carries a cane and non a common walking stick. A cane be the common as welll of intimidation used by the military and by those who pure tone they are superior to the average civilian. The silver handle on the cane illustrates his elegance. He had style, elegance and capital, as well as authority, his boilersuit effect universe a reality of status.He was one to a greater extent incognito in the city of illustrious incognitosThis quotation is a contradiction. concealed means in disguise, while illustrious means to stand out. This riddle sums up the President he wants to non be noticed, and silent wants fame. So while wearing clothes everyone else was wearing, something would make him stand out. He wants fame and actor, but not for world the President in exile. barely the fatigue duty of his skin betrayed the state of his healthWhere the president dressed stylishly, with fine clothes, and his hairsbreadth did not give out-of-door hints of age, with strands of grey hair, his skin was haggard and wrinkled that of an old man. The quotation shows that the president looked young and acted young, and if it were not for his skin he could have passed for a younger man.On his first visit to geneva the lake had been calm and clear and there were tame gulls that would eat of ones handThis is a hot example of Rhetoric. It uses torpedo textual oral communication and Marquez uses persuasive writing. This statement implies th at the president was very powerful and using the gulls as an analogy, compares them to civilians and how, once, they were at his beck and call.reconstructive memoryWhen arriving in Trinidad he became one more worthless man in a country full of powerful woeful menThis quotation is a contradiction the stereo-typical poor person would not be powerful. This paradox expresses how the President must have felt. Opposed to his power and wealth from running a country, he was now somewhat inferior. In exile in a foreign country, he was surrounded by men that were raised in this milieu. Powerful, by the means, that they knew and some dictated how everything worked.Only the slight problem of not being a legal citizen in Trinidad deceived the actual situation of his affairsThis quotation is a pejorative fact. The President might feel it a positive situation, as he could not be tied emotionally to any one place, so he cannot be hurt if he is, once more, thrown out, as in the case of Columbia. However it could also be a negative cistron because things that will be a necessity for a comfortable life, e.g. a job, would be almost impossible to achieve.Free Choice the bewilder simple headedness of a Lack of naughtOne never can converge the thing in itself, because the mind does not transcend phenomenaThis statement has sub textual meaning. On the surface it means, you cannot see something if the mind does not cogitate that it can out do the extra-ordinary. But underneath that, I feel that this quotation almost has a moralistic sub textual meaning, this being if you think that within yourself, you cant do something and you dont attempt to, you will never be able to. Once persuade it is impossible, it is.My vision began to diminish in two scope and clarity, and I prayed despairingly for the message that I had left to be procured by those to whom I had mean it, and not by those to whom the exorbitant value was exceeded only by their dispirited predilectionsThis quotat ion is a fine example of the stereo-typical religious belief that praying in a rugged situation, you will be relieved of all problems. The cite looks towards G-d to firstly protect him and secondly protect the information he has been entrusted with being recounted to the wrong people. The character believes that g-d will help him and this is a very good illustration of idolism.There are many comparisons to make between the to a higher place eight quotes, as well as between the three kick ups, all being entirely individual pieces. Bon Voyage, Mr. President and the Reconstruction are both somewhat related in the means that they have the same story line and background, the similarities very evident. But, however, The Perplexing Simplicity of a Lack of Nothing is a very diverse piece of writing, expressing confusion, desperation and obscurity unlike to Bon Voyage, Mr. President and the Reconstruction, which was full of prosperity and understanding. All three of these extracts were well written and individual however there are criticisms to be made.The President, in Bon Voyage, Mr. President, is a stereo-typical, military based, authoritarian figure. Things like stiff hat of a retired magistrate. Or arrogant moustache of a musketeer. all present the image of man in control, who would not commit a crime. In this description, nothing gives away any shrewdness or a clue that would reflect the crime he committed to be exiled. Marquez keeps some key information that would quit the reader to be more gripped by the short story, secret, and that, I feel, almost ruins the whole tale. By using a more Rhetoric typecast of writing the reader would find Marquezs writing more intriguing.The Reconstruction is meant to be linked to Bon Voyage, Mr. President, however the author portrayed Mr. President as quite a different character. The author implied that the President was a primed(p) back man, with much hope and little regret he was looking for towards the future and no t at the past by saying He now had a bounce in his step and he changed into a silk shirt with cotton shorts. This Rhetoric gives the opposite impression to which Bon Voyage, Mr. President was trying to bestow. This is an easy mistake, but if read together would confuse the reader.The Perplexing Simplicity of a Lack of Nothing is a very difficult piece to understand, with maybe hidden meaning. There was hardly any logical implication that could be drawn from it. A huge failure, of the author, was that, there did not reckon to be any constant story line, there was a base, but the majority jumped from idea to idea. Also, the words used were difficult to comprehend in a short story and too many used too close together. This material was more novel quality rather than an extract or short story, the author should have kept in mind what type of story they were asked to compose and not trail from it.