Death Penalty :: essays research papers fc

1st Negative case You turn out heard from the assentient side and you may dis mate or agree with some of their points, save the reality is that their plan will not and cannot result in todays society. True, on paper the plan looks truly good, solely it will not work. Todays present system, with the closing penalty is much better off then without it. The negative side, which my henchman and I represent, feels that the destruction penalty should not be abolished and that todays system, which allows states to choose if they want to impose the goal penalty, should continue to be used. It is squ atomic number 18 that innocent people have been executed, scarce that number is miniscule comp ared to the make sense of true criminals that are rightfully executed. There is 28-step procedure necessary beforehand any person can be take backn a death sentence. By having the process consist of numerous steps and involving many a(prenominal) contrary people, human error is greatly r educed. The death penalty is not racially or gender bias, much to the contrary of what the affirmative team believes. The position is that men commit more crimes, so they will be convicted at a greater rate then women. The ratio of men to women on death row and executed is 681 or 340050 (NAACP Spring 1996). From 1976-1994, men committed 7 times as many murders as women or a 71 ratio (Sourcebook 94). Therefore, it may be statically shown that men are, by a 701 ratio, more likely to be on death row then are women. Like gender bias, racial bias is nonexistent in the rulings involving the death penalty. Whites represent 56% of those executed, and blacks 38% (NAACP Summer of 1996). The other 6% are other minorities. The death penalty is not bias to any race, but by just looking at the numbers it may calculate that it is. The total populations of each race will give the illusion of bias, but that is not true. The affirmative side also argues that the cost of emotional state in prison without parole is much cheaper then the cost of the death penalty, but this, like their charge of bias, is also untrue. The death penalty is millions cheaper then life without parole in the long run, but when our numbers are compared to the affirmatives numbers no right or wrong end can be reached. No one team can give impartial numbers since studies by both sides are bias.